This week in the 212th District Court of Galveston County, Texas, Judge Criss granted a motion for a directed verdict of acquittal. Directed verdicts in criminal cases are rare. Judge Criss believes this is the first time in her thirteen (13) years on the bench to grant a directed verdict.
The defendant in the case was charged with the aggravated robbery of a the Dollar General Store in Texas City. Identity of the robbers was the contested issue. The defendant claimed he was in another town at the time of the robbery. The state presented a witness who testified she was able to identify the defendant from a photographic lineup shown to her by police. The judge granted the directed verdict after a 911 tape was produced wherein the same witness told her supervisor and the 911 operator that she didn’t know the race of the suspects. Store video showed the suspects both wore ski masks. The judge granted the directed verdict based on insufficient evidence of identity.
The right of a jury trial is a valuable thing. That said, any thing can happen at trial. We hope that justice will always be done. Unfortunately, that doesn’t always happen. More often then we like to admit, people are convicted of crimes they didn’t commit based on faulty eye witness testimony. I don’t know other details of this case but I’m glad we have a judge with the courage to grant a directed verdict when the evidence is just not there.
http://galvestondailynews.com/story/238950
Disclaimer:
No information that you obtain from this web site is legal advice, nor is it intended to be.
You should consult an attorney for individualized advice regarding your own unique situation.
No attorney-client relationship is formed between the Law Office of Mark J. Kelly and you by viewing this web site.
The defendant in the case was charged with the aggravated robbery of a the Dollar General Store in Texas City. Identity of the robbers was the contested issue. The defendant claimed he was in another town at the time of the robbery. The state presented a witness who testified she was able to identify the defendant from a photographic lineup shown to her by police. The judge granted the directed verdict after a 911 tape was produced wherein the same witness told her supervisor and the 911 operator that she didn’t know the race of the suspects. Store video showed the suspects both wore ski masks. The judge granted the directed verdict based on insufficient evidence of identity.
The right of a jury trial is a valuable thing. That said, any thing can happen at trial. We hope that justice will always be done. Unfortunately, that doesn’t always happen. More often then we like to admit, people are convicted of crimes they didn’t commit based on faulty eye witness testimony. I don’t know other details of this case but I’m glad we have a judge with the courage to grant a directed verdict when the evidence is just not there.
http://galvestondailynews.com/story/238950
Disclaimer:
No information that you obtain from this web site is legal advice, nor is it intended to be.
You should consult an attorney for individualized advice regarding your own unique situation.
No attorney-client relationship is formed between the Law Office of Mark J. Kelly and you by viewing this web site.